Tariff scenario cost calculator
Compare two Australian electricity tariff scenarios from user-entered usage, energy rates, daily supply charges and period length.
CostA = Usage_kWh x RateA / 100 + Days x SupplyA / 100; CostB = Usage_kWh x RateB / 100 + Days x SupplyB / 100; Difference = abs(CostA - CostB)- Daily usage is multiplied by the entered period days before both scenarios are calculated.
- Energy rates are entered manually in c/kWh.
- Daily supply charges are entered manually in cents/day.
- The comparison excludes demand charges, time-of-use splits, discounts, solar export, GST treatment and retailer contract terms.
| Variable | Meaning | Unit | Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usage_kWh | Period usage | kWh | Daily usage multiplied by entered days. |
| RateA | Scenario A energy rate | c/kWh | User-entered energy-rate assumption for scenario A. |
| RateB | Scenario B energy rate | c/kWh | User-entered energy-rate assumption for scenario B. |
| SupplyA | Scenario A daily supply charge | c/day | User-entered daily supply charge for scenario A. |
| SupplyB | Scenario B daily supply charge | c/day | User-entered daily supply charge for scenario B. |
| Days | Comparison period | days | Number of days used for both scenarios. |
| CostA | Scenario A cost | AUD | Energy charge plus daily supply charge for scenario A. |
| CostB | Scenario B cost | AUD | Energy charge plus daily supply charge for scenario B. |
| Difference | Scenario difference | AUD | Absolute difference between the two scenario costs. |
More
Tariff scenario cost calculator technical guide
Compare two Australian electricity tariff scenarios from user-entered usage, energy rates, daily supply charges and period length.
Use this calculator when the work question is a simple two-scenario comparison: the same usage period, two manually entered energy rates and two manually entered daily supply charges. It is useful for Australian estimating notes, facility reviews, tenant discussions and early operating-cost comparisons where the user already has tariff assumptions from a documented source.
This page is deliberately not a retailer plan comparison. It does not search live offers, read bills, apply discounts, model time-of-use bands, include solar exports, include GST treatment, interpret demand charges or decide whether a contract should be changed. It makes one comparison transparent so the source values can be checked.
Field Use Cases
| Work situation | Entered basis | Useful output | Outside the result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility estimate | Daily kWh and two flat-rate tariff assumptions | Scenario A, scenario B and cost difference | Retailer plan advice or contract recommendation |
| Tender allowance | Project usage estimate and client-provided rates | Transparent comparison for an estimating note | Full bill model, GST and fixed account terms |
| Temporary works | Short period usage and two supply-charge assumptions | Difference over the temporary period | Embedded-network billing or hire contract terms |
| Energy review | kWh from a load-profile worksheet | Which entered scenario is lower for that profile | Interval data import or time-band allocation |
| Small difference check | Similar rate and supply-charge assumptions | Review flag before treating the difference as meaningful | Savings claim or procurement decision |
A useful scenario record names the source. A note such as "30 c/kWh vs 24 c/kWh" is weak if it does not show where the rates came from, what period they apply to and whether the daily supply charges are comparable.
Scenario Boundary
| Included in this calculator | Not included in this calculator |
|---|---|
| Daily usage in kWh and period days | Live retailer plan data |
| Scenario A energy rate and daily supply charge | Discounts, pay-on-time conditions or contract terms |
| Scenario B energy rate and daily supply charge | Demand charges, ratchets or network tariff rules |
| Energy charge plus supply charge arithmetic | Time-of-use allocation across peak, shoulder and off-peak |
| Difference and percentage difference | GST treatment, solar export credits or controlled load |
The boundary matters because many Australian bills have more than one component. A simple comparison can still be valuable, but only when the user understands that the result is a worksheet line, not a bill interpretation.
Input Checklist
| Input | Strong basis | Weak basis |
|---|---|---|
| Scenario reference | Site, meter, estimate or comparison record | Generic tariff comparison with no site context |
| Daily usage | Load-profile result, metering summary or documented estimate | Guess copied from a different site |
| Period days | Actual estimate period or billing comparison window | Calendar month assumed without checking |
| Energy rates | c/kWh from relevant plan, bill, schedule or estimating instruction | Remembered rate without date or source |
| Daily supply charges | cents/day from the same scenario source | Fixed charge omitted when it differs materially |
If the usage came from a load profile, keep that profile record with the tariff comparison. If the usage came from a bill, record the bill period and whether the value is total site kWh or only one load group.
Review Workflow
- Define the site, meter, load group or estimate being compared.
- Confirm the same daily kWh and period days apply to both scenarios.
- Enter scenario A energy rate and daily supply charge from a documented source.
- Enter scenario B energy rate and daily supply charge from a documented source.
- Read the two costs, the lower-cost scenario and the absolute difference.
- If the difference is small, check fixed charges, GST, time bands, demand charges and contract terms before treating it as meaningful.
- If peak demand is part of the tariff, move to the demand charge calculator instead of forcing it into this page.
- Export only when the source and scope of both scenarios are recorded.
The workflow is intentionally conservative. It keeps the arithmetic visible while leaving tariff interpretation with the project, retailer or qualified reviewer.
Worked Australian Examples
| Situation | Scenario A | Scenario B | Practical reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy-only comparison | 42 kWh/day, 30 days, 30 c/kWh and 95 c/day | 24 c/kWh and 120 c/day | Scenario B is lower for the entered values. |
| Small difference review | 25 kWh/day, 31 days, 28 c/kWh and 100 c/day | 27 c/kWh and 120 c/day | Difference is small enough to check excluded bill details. |
| Temporary works | 60 kWh/day, 14 days, 34 c/kWh and 70 c/day | 30 c/kWh and 145 c/day | The short period makes the daily charge visible. |
These examples are not retailer recommendations. They show how the same kWh period reacts to different entered rate and daily-charge assumptions.
Related Tools
Use the energy cost calculator when the question is one load, one usage pattern and one entered tariff. Use the load profile kWh calculator when the daily kWh should come from multiple load blocks before comparison. Use the demand charge estimate calculator when the bill component depends on peak kW or kVA. Use the kVA, kW and power factor calculator only when the tariff input depends on a power relationship that needs its own record.
| Next question | Use next |
|---|---|
| One load and one tariff value | Energy cost calculator |
| Several load blocks produce the kWh | Load profile kWh calculator |
| Peak demand creates a separate charge | Demand charge estimate calculator |
| kVA must be converted to kW first | kVA, kW and PF calculator |
Stop Points
- The two scenarios are not for the same site, meter or usage period.
- One scenario includes GST and the other does not.
- One scenario includes discounts, solar export or controlled load effects and the other does not.
- Time-of-use bands are material but have been collapsed into one rate without explanation.
- Demand charges affect the decision but are not recorded separately.
- The result is being used as a public savings claim or retailer recommendation.
Keep the entered rates, daily supply charges, usage basis and source dates with the export. The result is a scenario worksheet for review, not a plan selector.
Energy-only scenario comparison
A site estimate compares two manually entered energy and supply-charge assumptions for a 30-day period.
- Reference
- TOU-CHECK-1
- Usage
- 42 kWh/day for 30 days
- Scenario A
- 30 c/kWh + 95 c/day
- Scenario B
- 24 c/kWh + 120 c/day
- Scenario A cost$406.5
- Scenario B cost$338.4
- Difference$68.1
16.75% difference for the entered period.
Scenario B is lower for the entered usage and period, but the record still needs the source and tariff boundary attached.
- Both scenarios use the same entered daily usage and period.
- Only energy and daily supply charges are included.
- Other tariff components remain outside the comparison.
Small difference review
A facility note compares two similar flat-rate assumptions before deciding whether more tariff detail is needed.
- Reference
- SMALL-DIFF-1
- Usage
- 25 kWh/day for 31 days
- Scenario A
- 28 c/kWh + 100 c/day
- Scenario B
- 27 c/kWh + 120 c/day
- Scenario A cost$248
- Scenario B cost$246.45
- Difference$1.55
0.63% difference for the entered period.
The difference is small enough that fixed charges, GST and time bands may matter more than the rounded comparison.
- The entered rates are energy-only comparison values.
- The daily supply charges are entered by the user.
- No contract terms or discounts are modelled.
Temporary works estimate
A temporary works allowance compares a higher energy rate with a lower daily charge across a short period.
- Reference
- TEMP-WORKS-1
- Usage
- 60 kWh/day for 14 days
- Scenario A
- 34 c/kWh + 70 c/day
- Scenario B
- 30 c/kWh + 145 c/day
- Scenario A cost$295.4
- Scenario B cost$272.3
- Difference$23.1
7.82% difference for the entered period.
The short period makes the daily charge visible, which is why both tariff parts must stay in the record.
- Usage is entered as a daily average.
- The period is a temporary estimate window.
- Demand, time bands and GST are not included.